News » News Features

How to Shoot Up Your Neighborhood

You can't just pull the trigger in Ohio and get away with it. At least not yet.

by

7 comments

Page 2 of 2

BEWARE OF RAGING CRACKHEADS

In legal realtalk, shootings inside the home rarely hit a courtroom, which is why Ohio operated so long without a specific doctrine on the books.

"You've got some guy coming into your house in the middle of the night when you're sleeping," says Christopher Thomarios, a Cleveland defense attorney. "You hear rustling, you open the door, and you shoot them. Who gets prosecuted there? How often do you get Joe Suburb prosecuted for shooting some guy who comes into his house with a knife? Not too much."

Since the law was passed in '08, only a handful of Ohio cases related to the castle doctrine have made headlines, although they have underscored the subtle differences between the old unstated provision and current law. Often, a little legal wiggle room thanks to new wording is all the difference.

Early this year, Butler County, just north of Cincinnati, saw such a case. A 75-year-old man reportedly suffering from Alzheimer's and dementia crashed his car into a stranger's house. The driver got out of the vehicle, stormed into the house, and headed for the basement, where he began Hulk-smashing the property. Inside, the homeowner, 84-year-old Charles Foster, confronted the whacked-out intruder, went back upstairs, and retrieved a gun. When he returned to the basement, he was attacked. In defense, Foster shot and killed the unexpected visitor.

A Butler County grand jury reviewed the case and OK'd the shooting.

"You and I might have said, 'Hell, I'm going to let this guy crash around in my house if he wants to, I'm going to go next door, call the police, and have them come get this guy out of my house,'" says Butler County prosecutor Mike Gmoser, who has no qualms with the outcome.

"That might have been, under the old law, the sensible thing to do. But hindsight is 20/20. And he did go arm himself, and he didn't have the duty to retreat."

Cuyahoga County prosecutors felt differently about the shooting that took place in Carl Kozlosky's house in 2009. A convicted felon on a crack binge broke into Kozlosky's Cleveland home in order to get some money from his girlfriend, a renter at the property. When the intruder started wailing on the woman, Kozlosky intervened, pulling the trigger when he believed the guy was going for a gun — but a gun was never found.

The jury convicted the homeowner of murder, but on appeal, the decision was overturned by the higher court due to the existing castle doctrine. The state hoped to run the issue up the food chain, but the Ohio Supreme Court declined to sniff over the matter.

COMING SOON:

SHOOT 'EM UP ANYWHERE

Today, post-Trayvon Martin, you can't get a clear snapshot of self-defense without the notion of "stand your ground" crowding the frame.

The Florida version of that law is what may justify Zimmerman's pull of the trigger, and depending on where your heels are dug in on the issue, the concept is either the logical end or an extreme perversion of the Second Amendment.

About a dozen states recognize stand your ground. The basic idea takes the same magic wand Ohio's castle doctrine waves over your homestead and points it at the public realm; under the law, you aren't bound by a duty to retreat in a self-defense situation if you've got a right to be there. That means if someone steps toward you anywhere from the pizza parlor to the parking lot, you can quick-draw, High Noon-style, without having to worry about whether you've properly scanned the exits for a getaway option.

For proponents, the stand-your-ground law is more realistic, considering most shootings happen in only a few adrenaline-greased heartbeats. To run or not to run isn't an equation your head can compute in a life-threatening situation, the thinking maintains, and such a requirement only gives overzealous prosecutors a sword to swing at shooters who were merely trying to defend themselves.

"If you and your wife or your girlfriend were getting in your car and somebody came up with a knife, would it be prudent to turn around and run," says Dan Clevenger, a firearms instructor with D&D Firearms Instructors. "It depends on the incident."

Because current Ohio law wraps a self-defense shooter in shades of gray, Clevenger and others believe the clarity provided by stand your ground isn't far off.

"Eventually that part of the law will come to Ohio," he says. "I think it will eventually change, because Ohio's conceal and carry laws have been changing for the better since 2004."

On the other side of the aisle, gun-safety advocates are not buying it. Lori O'Neill, vice chair of the National Gun Victims Action Council, says starting with the castle doctrine, and potentially continuing with stand your ground, these new laws give gun owners the opportunity to shrug off the legal repercussions of gunplay.

"What stand your ground says is, if you feel threatened in any way, you can shoot, no questions asked, and the presumption legally is that you were correct in doing so," she explains. "So it removes your legal responsibility to prove you are under deadly attack, and it's a presumption of innocence of a gun owner by virtue of the fact that they are a gun owner."

This spring, despite the heat over Trayvon Martin's death, gun lobbyists were in Columbus meeting with legislators about sending a stand-your-ground bill through the system. Nothing has been stamped for a vote yet, but supporters say the time is coming.

Down in Florida, George Zimmerman is currently back in a jail cell after violating the terms of his bond. He's set to go on trial for second-degree murder, although a flood of leaked details seems to alternately back up and throw into question the shooter's hold on a stand-your-ground defense.

So as of today, how would the country's most controversy-soaked self-defense matchup play in Ohio's courts? What if Zimmerman and Martin had crossed paths in Cleveland Heights? Without a stand-your-ground provision, the basic tenets of self-defense would have clicked in: Did Zimmerman fear for his life? Was he not the aggressor? And yes, could he have run away?

As we all know, only one side is still breathing to answer those questions, and whether you believe him probably depends on how you feel about hoodies.

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Cleveland Scene. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Cleveland Scene, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at news@clevescene.com.

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club


Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.


Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.


Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club for as little as $5 a month.