Bill Callahan calls out Voinovich on a recent vote:
Our Republican Senator explains his “No” vote on mortgage-relief-in-bankruptcy to Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim:
I evaluated it and it harms more than it helps. It’s the precedent that it sets in terms of a lot of people who are out there quite frankly very responsible. Our credit unions were giving money to people who were responsible. You’ve got some people who were being very responsible and doing their job and come to you and say if this happens we’re going to have to change the interest rate, recalculate. I mean, I want to encourage those people. I don’t want to discourage them.
Oh, I see. George was just protecting credit unions. … So here’s what we need to know from our Republican Senator: Would he have voted “Yes” on a version of the Durbin amendment that met the needs of credit unions, which can legitimately claim they’ve been innocent bystanders in the subprime foreclosure crisis? Would he change his vote to “Yes” if a credit-union-friendly version came to the floor next week?
We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Cleveland Scene. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Cleveland Scene, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.
Email us at email@example.com.
Support Local Journalism.
Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club
Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.
Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.