Cleveland Clinic to Discipline Physician Who Published Anti-Vac Opinion Piece on


Dr. Daniel Neides, the medical director and COO of the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute, penned a fiercely anti-science and anti-vac opinion piece. There are, at least, two big problems with that. First, that he believes anything that he said and disseminated, without authorization from the hospital, the myths to the general public. The second, that casually published the piece on Friday afternoon, lending authority and a megaphone to the nonsense.

In the rambling piece, which reads like a chain letter or a sub-Reddit conspiracy screed, Neides tees off on a wide range of debunked theories, including a nod to the fear-mongering and disproven link between vaccines and autism and a half-dozen or so other generally misinformed opinions — again, from the mouth of a Cleveland Clinic doctor through the region's largest media outlet.

The post quickly spread over the weekend and attracted nearly universal scorn from the medical community. The Clinic issued a blunt statement in the aftermath:

“Cleveland Clinic is fully committed to evidence-based medicine. Harmful myths and untruths about vaccinations have been scientifically debunked in rigorous ways. We completely support vaccinations to protect people, especially children who are particularly vulnerable. Our physician published his statement without authorization from Cleveland Clinic. His views do not reflect the position of Cleveland Clinic and appropriate disciplinary action will be taken.”

Neides, for his part, apologized and retracted his statements, though they remain online in the original article.

A Plain Dealer article posted on (the website) about the behind-the-scenes action at (the company/publication) attempted to clarify how it got published in the first place.

Neides has been blogging on's South Euclid-Lyndhurst community blog for about two years on a variety of wellness-related topics.

His most recent column, posted on Friday afternoon, quickly sparked outrage when it was discovered by the medical and scientific community on social media sites. The column was removed briefly from the site Sunday afternoon, though it's not clear if Neides, who had privileges to log into and alter content on the community blog, or someone else removed it. It was restored shortly after.
Which isn't all that clear.

We've reached out to for further information and will update you if/when they respond.

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Cleveland Scene. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Cleveland Scene, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club for as little as $5 a month.