Environmental Groups Say Trump's Coal and Nuclear Power Bailout Would be a Raw Deal for Ohioans


1 comment
  • Pixabay

COLUMBUS, Ohio - Environmental groups in Ohio say a proposed plan to bail out failing coal and nuclear plants is a raw deal for consumers.

The White House is considering an order that would force grid operators to purchase electric power from struggling coal and nuclear plants. Neil Waggoner, Ohio Beyond Coal Campaign representative for the Sierra Club, contended that such a bailout would be expensive and is unnecessary. He said grid operators, industry experts, utilities and consumer advocates - including the Ohio Public Utilities Commission - have said many times that there is no energy shortage and no reliability concerns if economically challenged plants retire.

"This is Trump clearly trying to do anything he can to help his millionaire coal and nuclear executive buddies by trying to demand Americans and Ohioans pay more every month to prop up these uneconomic coal and nuclear plants," he said. "That's not right, it's not good policy and it just doesn't make any sense."

It's estimated that a bailout of failing coal and nuclear plants could cost consumers somewhere between $311 million and nearly $12 billion annually. A draft policy memo from the Department of Energy stated that the proposal is needed to help safeguard the energy grid amid national security and defense concerns.

Waggoner added that in a modern energy market - where solar, wind and energy efficiency are cheaper - coal and nuclear power plants strapped with high operating costs are becoming obsolete.

"Right now, investment dollars are going into energy-efficiency programs and into new clean energy," he said. "That's where businesses want to go. That's where the public wants to go. They don't want to be spending more to bail out plants that have been paid for over and over and over again for decades."

The plan would use the Federal Power Act and the Cold War-Era Defense Production Act, a wartime law that essentially allows the president to secure scarce resources for national defense. However, Waggoner and other opponents have argued there's no evidence of an energy emergency. He also noted that federal regulators earlier this year said any threats to the grid from extreme weather events provide no basis to subsidize noncompetitive coal and nuclear plants.

Cost data is online at energyinnovation.org.

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Cleveland Scene. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Cleveland Scene, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at news@clevescene.com.

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Cleveland Scene Press Club for as little as $5 a month.